The influence of intangible assets intensity and related-party transactions on tax aggressiveness
Empirical study of companies in the non-cyclical consumer sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54957/educoretax.v6i10.2418Kata Kunci:
Effective Tax Rate, Intangible Assets, Profitability, Related Party Transaction, Tax AggressivenessAbstrak
This study aims to empirically examine and analyze the effect of Intangible Assets and Related Party Transactions (RPT) on tax aggressiveness, using profitability (ROA) and firm size as control variables. The level of tax aggressiveness in this study is measured using the Effective Tax Rate (ETR) proxy, where a lower ETR value indicates a higher level of tax aggressiveness. The research population includes all Consumer Non-Cyclicals sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the 2022–2025 period. Sampling was conducted using the purposive sampling method, resulting in 23 sample companies with a total of 92 panel data observations. Data analysis was performed using the panel data regression method through a Fixed Effect Model (FEM) approach, which was corrected with Cross-section SUR (Panel Corrected Standard Errors/PCSE) estimation to resolve heteroskedasticity issues. The statistical test results prove that simultaneously, Intangible Assets, RPT, profitability, and firm size have a significant effect on tax aggressiveness with the model's explanatory power (Adjusted R-Squared) of 63.81%. Partially, Intangible Assets and firm size are proven to have no significant effect on the level of tax aggressiveness. Conversely, Related Party Transactions (RPT) and profitability (ROA) are proven to have a negative and significant effect on ETR, meaning that an increase in the volume of related party transactions and return on assets tangibly drives an increase in the company's tax aggressiveness practices.
Referensi
Aditya, A. B., Nuryati, T., Rossa, E., Faeni, D. P., & Manrejo, S. (2023). Pengaruh Intangible Asset dan Profitabilitas terhadap Tax Avoidance dengan Transfer Pricing sebagai Variabel Moderasi. 2.
Ariani, A., & Asmedi, S. (n.d.). PENGARUH SALES GROWTH, CAPITAL INTENSITY DAN KEBIJAKAN UTANG TERHADAP AGRESIVITAS PAJAK.
Balla, V., Ballas, P., & Sykianakis, N. (2025). The subjective power of intangibles in a firm’s growth: Unlocking hidden assets within a company strategy. Corporate and Business Strategy Review, 6(4), 184. https://doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i4art17
Baltagi, B. H. (2005). Econometric analysis of panel data (Third edition). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995). What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 634–647. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082979
Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2019). Fundamentals of financial management (15e ed.). Cengage.
Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q., & Shevlin, T. (2010). Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms? Journal of Financial Economics, 95(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2009.02.003
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (Fifth edition). SAGE.
Desai, M. A., & Dharmapala, D. (2006). Corporate tax avoidance and high-powered incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(1), 145–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.02.002
Disya Yuke Farhana, Enggar Diah Puspa Arum, Ilham Wahyudi, & Wiralestari Wiralestari. (2026). Transfer Pricing, Thin Capitalization, and Intangible Assets’ Impact on Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Indonesian Manufacturing Firms (2022-2024). Jurnal Ekonomi, Akuntansi, Dan Perpajakan, 3(2), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.61132/jeap.v3i2.2225
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.2307/258191
Fadilla, M. R., Nuryati, T., Rossa, E., Faeni, D. P., & Manrejo, S. (2023). Pengaruh Intangible Asset dan Tunneling Incentive terhadap Tax Avoidance dengan Profitabilitas sebagai Variabel Moderasi. 2.
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1086/467037
Farid Fadillah & Dicky Arisudhana. (2025). PENGARUH UMUR PERUSAHAAN, PROFITABILITAS, UKURAN PERUSAHAAN, SOLVABILITAS, TERHADAP AUDIT DELAY. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 3(1), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.69714/ktgc7708
Frank, M. M., Lynch, L. J., & Rego, S. O. (2009). Tax Reporting Aggressiveness and Its Relation to Aggressive Financial Reporting. The Accounting Review, 84(2), 467–496. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.2.467
Godfrey, J., Hodgson, A., Tarca, A., Hamilton, J., & Holmes, S. (Eds.). (2010). Accounting theory (7. ed). Wiley.
Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2–3), 127–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.002
Hayati, T. N., Handayani, D., & Rissi, D. M. (n.d.). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Tax Avoidance Sektor Consumer Non-Cyclical di Bursa Efek Indonesia (2020–2024).
Hsiao, C. (2022). Analysis of Panel Data (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009057745
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Leonatan, J., & Yunior, K. (2021). PENGARUH ROE, DER, DAN NPM TERHADAP HARGA SAHAM SEKTOR CONSUMER GOODS DI BEI PERIODE 2015-2019. Warta Dharmawangsa, 15(3), 320–330. https://doi.org/10.46576/wdw.v15i3.1353
Naruli, A., Kusumaningarti, M., & Agustin, A. I. (2022). Pengaruh Transfer Pricing Dan Aset Tak Berwujud Terhadap Penghindaran Pajak. Jurnal Ilmiah Cendekia Akuntansi, 7(4), 111. https://doi.org/10.32503/cendekiaakuntansi.v7i4.2920
OECD. (2015). Aligning Transfer Pricing Outcomes with Value Creation, Actions 8-10—2015 Final Reports. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264241244-en
Puji Lestari, M. & Siti Aliyah. (2022). ANALISIS DETERMINAN TERHADAP AGRESIVITAS PAJAK: (Studi pada perusahaan LQ 45). JAE (JURNAL AKUNTANSI DAN EKONOMI), 7(2), 120–136. https://doi.org/10.29407/jae.v7i2.17761
Putri, N. & Sekar Mayangsari. (2023). PENGARUH RELATED PARTY TRANSACTION, THIN CAPITALIZATION, INTANGIBLE ASSETS, DAN KOMPENSASI KERUGIAN FISKAL TERHADAP PENGHINDARAN PAJAK. Jurnal Ekonomi Trisakti, 3(2), 3231–3242. https://doi.org/10.25105/jet.v3i2.17938
Ristianti, A., & Ramdani, D. (2026). Pengaruh Transfer Pricing dan Intangible Asset Terhadap Penghindaran Pajak (Tax Avoidance). 02(04).
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (Seventh edition). John Wiley & Sons.
Slemrod, J. (2004). The Economics of Corporate Tax Selfishness. National Tax Journal, 57(4), 877–899. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2004.4.06
Suyanto, & Amiah, N. (2022). Profitabilitas, Intensitas Modal Dan Penghindaran Pajak: Ukuran Perusahaan Sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. Jurnal Literasi Akuntansi, 2(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.55587/jla.v2i1.13
Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (2002). Positive accounting theory (Transferred to digital print on demand). Prentice-Hall.
White, H. (1980). A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 817. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912934
Zimmerman, J. L. (1983). Taxes and firm size. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5, 119–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(83)90008-3
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Muhammad Januar Rohimulloh, Runita Arum Kanti
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
