Effect Of Industry And Service Sectors On Goods And Services Tax Revenue In The G20: Per Capita Income As A Moderator
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54957/educoretax.v3i4.662Kata Kunci:
Goods and Services Tax, Per Capita Income, Share of Industry, Share of ServiceAbstrak
This research aims to examine the factors influencing the tax revenue from goods and services in G20 countries. After conducting various tests and analyses, it was found that the best model for this study is the Fixed Effect (FE) model. The analysis revealed that both the contribution of the industrial sector to GDP and the contribution of the service sector to GDP have a significant positive effect on tax revenue from goods and services. Additionally, per capita income also positively and significantly influences tax revenue. However, when moderated by per capita income, the positive effect of the industrial and service sectors on tax revenue weakened. This suggests that countries heavily reliant on a specific industrial sector for their GDP and tax revenue may face higher risks if that sector fluctuates. Similarly, if a country's economy is dominated by other sectors, the positive influence of the service sector on tax revenue might be hindered. Based on the results of this research, recommendations can be made for governments to enhance support for both the industrial and service sectors, diversify the economic structure to reduce dependency risks on a single sector, and formulate policies that foster inclusive economic growth and increased per capita income. Taking proactive measures based on the findings of this research is expected to enable G20 countries to achieve strong, sustainable, and inclusive economic growth, aligning with the objectives of the G20 formation.
Referensi
Arif, I., & Rawat, A. S. (2018). Corruption, governance, and tax revenue: evidence from EAGLE countries.
Bird, R., Martinez-Vazques, J., & Torgler, B. (2004). Societal Institutions and Tax Effort in Developing Countries. International Studies Program Working Paper.
BPS. (2023). Istilah. BPS.
Chaudhry, I., & Munir, F. (2010). Determinants of Low Tax Revenue in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences.
Chusna, A. (2013). Pengaruh Laju Pertumbuhan Sektor Industri, Investasi, dan Upah Terhadap Penyerapan Tenaga Kerja Sektor Industri di Provinsi Jawa Tengah Tahun 1980-2011. Economics Development Analysis Journal, 14–23. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/edaj
Coordinating Minister for the Economy RI. (2018, November 10). Perkuat Sektor Jasa, Kemenko Perekonomian Gelar Wicara Upgrade Skill. Kemenko Perekonomian.
Duggan, V., Rahardja, S., & Varela, G. (2013). Service Sector Reform and Manufacturing Evidence from Indonesia. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 6349.
Eltony. (2002). Determinants of Tax Efforts in Arab Countries. Arab Planning Institute Working Paper 207.
Gujarati, D. (2003). Ekonometri Dasar. Erlangga.
Gupta, A. Sen. (2007). Determinants of Tax Revenue Efforts in Developing Countries. IMF Working Paper.
Indah, R. N. (2022, February 20). Apa itu G20 dan Manfaatnya untuk Indonesia. DJKN Kemenkeu.
Kotler, P. (2009). Manajemen Pemasaran. Erlangga.
Ministry of Industry RI. (2022, November 19). Indonesia Sukses Jalankan Presidensi G20, Memperkuat Pertumbuhan Industri Manufaktur Inklusif dan Berkelanjutan. Siaran Pers Kementerian Perindustrian RI.
Odhuno, F. (2016). Taxation Policy for Papua New Guinea View project Using unconventional variables in economic models View project. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312614143
Permadi, D. G., & Suparna, W. (2022). Analysis of determinants of value added tax revenue in Asia. 622–631.
Piancastelli, M. (2001). Measuring the Tax Effort of Developed and Developing Countries: Cross Country Panel Data Analysis. IPEA Working Paper No. 818.
Sarmento, J. (2016). The Determinants of Value Added Tax Revenue in the Europe Union. European Journal of Management Studies, 79–99.
Satria, R. (2020, July 8). 4 Sektor Industri: Primer, Sekunder, Tersier, dan Kuartener. Supergeografi.
Scott, G. (2022, March 29). Service Sector: Place in Economy, Definition and Examples. Investopedia.
Sihombing, P. R. (2021). Corat Coret Catatan Statistisi Pemula Penerbit Yayasan Sahabat Alam Rafflesia.
Sinaga, W. A. (2022, March 2). Presidensi G-20, Pulihkan Perekonomian Indonesia. DJKN Kemenkeu.
Siswanto, D. (2023, March 15). Belanja Masyarakat Ngegas, Penerimaan Pajak Konsumsi Diproyeksi Makin Gendut. Kontan.
Stotsky, J. G., & Wolde Mariam, A. (1997). Tax Effort in Sub-Saharan Africa. Working Paper 107: International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.
Tamburian, L., Kawung, G. M. V, & Sumual, J. I. (2017). Analisis Pengaruh Sektor Jasa dan Sektor Indsutri Terhadap Pendapatan Pajak di Kota Manado. Jurnal Berkala Ilmiah Efisiensi, 17(03), 155–164.
Tax Education Public. (2015, April 29). Penghasilan Kelas Menengah Naik = Potensi Pajak? BPPK Kemenkeu.
Tristianto, Arisman, A., & Fajriana, I. (2013). Pengaruh Jumlah Industri, PDRB, dan Pendapatan Per Kapita Terhadap Penerimaan Pajak Reklame Sebagai Pendapatan Asli Daerah Kota Palembang. Jurnal Ekonomi.
UGM. (2016, April 15). Industri Jasa Berpotensi Besar Terhadap Peningkatan Ekonomi Indonesia. Gadjah Mada University.
Vivian, Y. F. A. (2023, April). Cek Perbedaan GST dan PPN Hingga Dampaknya Pada Ekonomi. Pajakku.
Wiguna, Y., & Wijaya, S. (2023). Pengaruh Sektor Industri dan Jasa Terhadap Penerimaan Pajak pada Lima Negara Scandinavia: Pendapatan Perkapita Sebagai Variabel Moderasi. JURNALKU, 3(2).
World Bank. (2023). GDP (current US$).
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2023 Dhinnessa Prabowo, Suparna Wijaya
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
