Underground Economy And Taxation Of Prostitution (Literature Study In Indonesia)

Penulis

  • Raldin Alif Al Hazmi Politeknik Keuangan Negara STAN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54957/educoretax.v4i3.759

Kata Kunci:

Prostitusi, Pajak, Underground Economy

Abstrak

Prostitution is actually an undergorund economy that is difficult to detect, because every commercial sex worker in this business is difficult to distinguish from ordinary people in general. In terms of taxation, tax is designed not to recognise assets obtained from legal activities, and from illegal activities, no matter whether the income is obtained from corruption, prostitution, human trafficking, illegal arms trade and even narcotics. As long as it is known that there is an increase in income or enjoyment, the state has the right to collect taxes. However, the relationship between prostitution and taxes is very sensitive. Prostitution business has a huge potential. Exploring the potential of this business if done massively will increase tax revenue significantly, but there is a trade off that DJP must face. In this case, DJP must also use the moral point of view prevailing in society. Taxing something illegal and immoral will indirectly give an opinion to the public that the state legalises the activity.

Referensi

Adlini, M. N., Anisya Hanifa Dinda, Sarah Yulinda, Octavia Chotimah, & Sauda Julia Merliyana. (2022). METODE PENELITIAN KUALITATIF STUDI PUSTAKA. Edumaspul, 6(1).

Amalia, S., Dio Caisar Darma, Siti Maria, Dirga Lestari, & Adi Wijaya. (2020). Underground Economy: Teori & Catatan Kelam (Alex Rikki, Ed.). Yayasan Kita Menulis, 2020.

Dahlan, M. (2020). SHADOW ECONOMY, AEOI, DAN KEPATUHAN PAJAK . Scientax, 2(1).

detik.com. (2023). Daftar Harga Open BO Berdasarkan Kota, Siapa Tertinggi? . Https://Www.Detik.Com/Sumut/Berita/d-6914031/Daftar-Harga-Open-Bo-Berdasarkan-Kota-Siapa-Tertinggi.

Fadli, M. R. (2021). Memahami desain metode penelitian kualitatif. Humanika, Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 21(1).

Hubungan Keuangan Antara Pemerintah Pusat Dan Pemerintah Daerah, Pub. L. No. UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2022 (2022).

Kartiko, N. D., & Widjiastuti, A. (2022). POTENSI PAJAK DALAM EKONOMI DIGITAL DAN REKOMENDASI KEBIJAKANNYA. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknolog, 3(1).

kompas.com. (2022). 2 Maret 2020, Saat Indonesia Pertama Kali Dilanda Covid-19 . Https://Nasional.Kompas.Com/Read/2022/03/02/10573841/2-Maret-2020-Saat-Indonesia-Pertama-Kali-Dilanda-Covid-19?Page=all.

koran-jakarta.com. (2022). Beberapa Negara Ini Melegalkan Bisnis Birahi, Bahkan Ada Negara Yang Menggaji Para Pekerjanya. Https://Koran-Jakarta.Com/Beberapa-Negara-Ini-Melegalkan-Bisnis-Birahi-Bahkan-Ada-Negara-Yang-Menggaji-Para-Pekerjanya?Page=all.

Kristianto, A. H., & Widya, P. R. (2019). Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dan Aktivitas Underground Economy. Bina Ekonomi, 23(2).

Kumparan.com. (2021, December). Ramai Kasus Cassandra Angelie, Intip Perputaran Uang di Bisnis Prostitusi RI. Https://Kumparan.Com/Kumparanbisnis/Ramai-Kasus-Cassandra-Angelie-Intip-Perputaran-Uang-Di-Bisnis-Prostitusi-Ri-1xDXxCFKD6t.

Liputan6.com. (2021). Tarif Menginap Artis TA Mencapai Rp 70 Juta. Https://Www.Liputan6.Com/Showbiz/Read/4613163/Tarif-Menginap-Artis-Ta-Mencapai-Rp-70-Juta.

Media Indonesia. (2024). Kota Cirebon Terapkan Pajak Hiburan 50%. Https://Mediaindonesia.Com/Jabar/Berita/646850/Kota-Cirebon-Terapkan-Pajak-Hiburan-50.

Mulyawan, A. W. (2017). ANALISIS UNDERGROUND ECONOMY INDONESIA DAN POTENSI PENERIMAAN PAJAK DI ERA TAX AMNESTY. INFO ARTHA, 1(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.31092/jia.v1i1.18

Nizar, M. A., & Purnomo, K. (2011). POTENSI PENERIMAAN PAJAK DARI UNDERGROUND ECONOMY DI INDONESIA. Kajian Ekonomi Dan Keuangan , 15(2).

Penyesuaian Pengaturan Di Bidang Pajak Penghasilan (2022).

Permana, A. (2020). Dampak Positif Pandemi COVID-19 Bagi Akselerasi Transformasi Digital. Https://Www.Itb.Ac.Id/News/Read/57613/Home/Dampak-Positif-Pandemi-Covid-19-Bagi-Akselerasi-Transformasi-Digital.

Rahmaini, I. S., & A Zahid. (2020). KOMODIFIKASI PROSTITUSI ONLINE SEBAGAI KRITIK ATAS GLOBALISASI. Jurnal Asketik: Agama Dan Perubahan Sosial, 4(1).

Samuda, S. J. A. (2016). UNDERGROUND ECONOMY IN INDONESIA. Buletin Ekonomi Moneter Dan Perbankan, 19(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.21098/bemp.v19i1.599

Schneider, F., & Enste, D. H. (2000). Shadow Economies: Size, Causes, and Consequences. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(1), 77–114. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.1.77

Sukardi, E., Debora Pasaribu, Graceyana Jennifer, & Vanessa Xavieree Kaliye. (2023). MEMBERANTAS PROSTITUSI ONLINE PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID-19 MELALUI SOSIALISASI HUKUM PERSPEKTIF TEORI KEADILAN BERMARTABAT. Jurnal Lembaga Ketahanan Nasional Republik Indonesia.

Supraja, M., & Artosa, O. A. (2023). Kemiskinan Pekerja Perempuan dan Sektor Informal di Sarkem. Jurnal Masyarakat Dan Desa, 3(1).

Suryadi, S. A. (2011). Interaksi Sosial Antara Pekerja Seks Komersial (PSK) dengan Masyarakat (Studi Kasus di Kawasan Resosialisasi Argorejo Sunan Kuning Kota Semarang). Under Graduates Thesis, Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Tanzi, V. (2002). The Shadow Economy, Its Causes and Its Consequences. Brazilian Institute of Ethics in Competition,.

Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2008 Tentang Perubahan Keempat Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1983 Tentang Pajak Penghasilan (2008).

Undang-Undang (UU) Nomor 7 Tahun 2021 Tentang Harmonisasi Peraturan Perpajakan (2021).

Yanto, O. (2018). PROSTITUSI SEBAGAI KEJAHATAN TERHADAP EKSPLOITASI ANAK YANG BERSIFAT ILEGAL DAN MELAWAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia.

Diterbitkan

06-04-2024

Cara Mengutip

Al Hazmi, R. A. (2024). Underground Economy And Taxation Of Prostitution (Literature Study In Indonesia). Educoretax, 4(3), 388–394. https://doi.org/10.54957/educoretax.v4i3.759

Terbitan

Bagian

Articles