Redesigning post audit oversight in Indonesia's digital tax architechture: Behavioural compliance integration and the coretax system
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54957/educoretax.v6i10.2321Kata Kunci:
Behavioural taxation, Coretax, Post audit oversight, Slippery Slope Framework, Tax complianceAbstrak
Despite decades of modernisation efforts, Indonesia’s tax-to-GDP ratio remains entrenched at approximately 10-12%, far below both the OECD benchmark and Asia Pacific regional norms. A significant contributor to this fiscal underperformance is the deterioration of taxpayer compliance in the period immediately following a tax audit, a phenomenon widely documented in behavioural economics as the Bomb Crater Effect (BoCE). Drawing on an interpretivist qualitative case study conducted at KPP Pratama Pondok Aren, based on semi-structured interviews with five purposively selected tax officials (two tax auditors, two Heads of the Supervision Section, and one Account Representative), document analysis, and triangulation, this research investigates the structural and behavioural determinants of post-audit non-compliance among VAT-registered enterprises (PKP). The study integrates the Slippery Slope Framework (SSF), institutional analysis, and an examination of the 2025 rollout of Indonesia’s Core Tax Administration System (Coretax) to map the interplay between technological disruption, bureaucratic fragmentation, and eroding taxpayer trust, and it examines the regulatory implications of Director General Regulation PER-9/PJ/2025, which targets fictitious Value Added Tax invoice networks. This paper advances a five-pillar ‘Sustained Post-Audit Compliance’ model encompassing compliance-by-design architecture, behavioural nudges, cross-functional Account Representative and auditor integration, risk-calibrated enforcement, and Pancasila-grounded institutional reform. The findings enrich the nascent Tax Administration 3.0 literature and furnish evidence-based guidance for policymakers committed to broadening Indonesia’s revenue base.
Referensi
Allingham, M. G., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1(3–4), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(72)90010-2
Alm, J., & Belahouaoui, R. (2025). Emerging trends in tax fraud detection using artificial intelligence-based technologies. Tulane University, Department of Economics. https://ideas.repec.org/p/tul/wpaper/2511.html
Alm, J., & Kasper, M. (2022). Audits, audit effectiveness, and post-audit tax compliance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 195, 87–102.
Bisnis.com. (2025a). Data lengkap penerimaan pajak Januari 2025, satu bulan setelah Coretax berlaku. Bisnis.Com. https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20250312/259/1860665/data-lengkap-penerimaan-pajak-januari-2025-satu-bulan-setelah-coretax-berlaku
Bisnis.com. (2025b). Tak ada Coretax di APBN KiTa. Bisnis.Com. https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20250314/259/1861368/tak-ada-coretax-di-apbn-kita
Cahyani, D. E. (2022). Pengaruh e-faktur, penegakan sanksi pajak, dan pelayanan perpajakan terhadap kepatuhan pengusaha kena pajak dengan pengetahuan perpajakan sebagai variabel mediasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 6(2), 11041–11056.
Christina, S. (2022). Tax compliance of individual taxpayer in DKI Jakarta, Indonesia. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 15(1), 96. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTGM.2022.120908
Djinarto, B., Suhartono, S., Hadi, S., Setyadji, S., & Nickalus, J. (2024). Reforming tax law enforcement: The role of core tax administration system digitalization and the ultimum remedium principle. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v5i4.4297
Hallsworth, M., List, J. A., Metcalfe, R. D., & Vlaev, I. (2017). The behavioralist as tax collector: Using natural field experiments to enhance tax compliance. Journal of Public Economics, 148, 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.02.003
Kasper, M., Kogler, C., & Kirchler, E. (2015). Tax policy and the news: An empirical analysis of taxpayers’ perceptions of tax-related media coverage and its impact on tax compliance. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 54, 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2014.11.001
Kasper, M., & Rablen, M. D. (2023). Tax compliance after an audit: Higher or lower? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 207, 157–171.
Kastlunger, B., Kirchler, E., Mittone, L., & Pitters, J. (2009). Sequences of audits, tax compliance, and taxpaying strategies. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(3), 405–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2008.10.004
Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., & Wahl, I. (2008). Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The “slippery slope” framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.05.004
Kusuma, I. G. K. C. B. A., Supriyadi, S., Aribowo, I., & Widiastuti, A. (2025). Supervision and law enforcement towards improving taxpayer compliance at Pondok Aren Pratama KPP. Journal of Governance, Taxation and Auditing, 4(3), 570–579.
Mebratu, A. A. (2024). Theoretical foundations of voluntary tax compliance: Evidence from a developing country. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 443. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02903-y
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mittone, L. (2006). Dynamic behaviour in tax evasion: An experimental approach. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(5), 813–835.
OECD. (2020). Tax administration 3.0: The digital transformation of tax administration. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2025). Revenue statistics in Asia and the Pacific 2025. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/revenue-statistics-in-asia-and-the-pacific-2025_6c04402f-en.html
Pambudi, J. E., Sunaryo, D., Fitriana, A. I., & Febrianto, H. G. (2026). Can institutional investors shape tax efficiency? Evidence from green accounting, capital intensity, and deferred tax strategies in emerging markets. Corporate and Business Strategy Review, 7(2), 16. https://doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv7i2art2
Peraturan Direktur Jenderal Pajak Nomor PER-9/PJ/2025 Tentang Penanganan Faktur Pajak Tidak Sah (2025).
Primasari, S., & Hendrani, A. (2022). Pengaruh kompleksitas pajak, pemeriksaan pajak dan sanksi pajak terhadap kepatuhan wajib pajak. Fair Value: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 5(4), 1703–1709. https://doi.org/10.32670/fairvalue.v5i4.2616
Pryke, M., & Allen, J. (2022). The everyday construction of value: A Canadian investment fund, Chilean water infrastructure, and financial subordination. Finance and Society, 8(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.2218/finsoc.7767
Saumi, M., & Ernandi, H. (2023). Pengaruh kinerja account representative, kualitas pelayanan fiskus, pemeriksaan pajak dan penagihan pajak terhadap kepatuhan wajib pajak. Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis Dan Pendidikan, 3(2), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.17977/um066v3i22023p43-54
Supriyati, Hapsari, I., & Nahumury, J. (2024). The influence of trust in the government, perceived fairness, and tax morale on taxpayer compliance: Implications for budget formation. Public and Municipal Finance, 13(2), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.21511/pmf.13(2).2024.11
Surat Edaran Direktur Jenderal Pajak Nomor SE-39/PJ/2021 Tentang Compliance Risk Management (2021).
Totanan, C., Jamaluddin, Muliati, Zahra, F., & Ilham Pakawaru, M. (2024). The complexity of tax regulations and principles of justice as determinants of taxpayer compliance: case of Indonesia. Public and Municipal Finance, 13(1), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.21511/pmf.13(1).2024.14
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Zairin, G. M., Khairunnisa, H., Naufal, A., Fahrozi, M. L., Suyono, W. P., & Anugrah, S. (2025). Advancing taxation in the new era: Enhancing tax ratios with the Core Tax Administration System (CTAS) (pp. 85–98). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-0147-9_8
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Irwan Aribowo, I Gede Komang Chahya Bayu Anta Kusuma, Supriyadi Supriyadi

Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








