The effect of pressure, opportunity, rationalization, capability, arrogance, and collusion on fraudulent financial statement

Penulis

  • Shifa Nurhaliza Az Zahra Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
  • Ferry Irawan Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54957/educoretax.v5i7.1720

Kata Kunci:

BUMN, Fraudulent financial statement, Fraud hexagon

Abstrak

The financial statement provides financial information presented by a company for a specific period to assess its financial condition, capabilities, and operational performance. This information is valuable for both external and internal stakeholders. Thus, it is crucial for financial statements to be presented accurately and free from errors. However, manipulation or fraud in financial reporting remains a common issue. This study examines fraudulent financial statement in state-owned enterprises (BUMN) from 2018 to 2022 using the hexagon fraud theory. A quantitative approach is employed, utilizing secondary data from annual reports. The study uses 100 data from 20 companies selected through purposive sampling over the 2018–2022 period. Data were analyzed using panel data analysis with STATA software. The findings indicate that pressure (X1), opportunity (X2), rationalization (X3), arrogance (X5), and collusion (X6) have no significant effect on fraudulent financial reporting, while capability (X4) has a significant negative effect.

Referensi

ACFE. (2020). Report to the Nations.

Achmad, T., Ghozali, I., & Pamungkas, I. D. (2022). Hexagon Fraud: Detection of Fraudulent Financial Reporting in State-Owned Enterprises Indonesia. Economies, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10010013

Alfarisi, D. A. (2010). Metode Untuk Mendeteksi Kolusi (Edisi 3). Jurnal Persaingan Usaha.

Ali, M. (2022). Menolak Tindak Pianda Pasar Modal Dalam Perkara PT. Asuransi Jiwasraya Sebagai Korupsi. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 7(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v7i1.4887

Apriliana, S., & Agustina, L. (2017). The Analysis of Fraudulent Financial Reporting Determinant through Fraud Pentagon Approach. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi, 9(2), 154–165. https://doi.org/10.15294/jda.v9i2.4036

Astuti, I. N., Senjani, Y. P., & Haryono, S. (2022). Determinan Kualitas Audit Berdasarkan Standar Perikatan and Ukuran KAP. Media Riset Akuntansi, Auditing & Informasi, 22(2), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.25105/mraai.v22i2.13985

Ayati, E. E. T., Nupus, S. I., Yusdian, & Wulandari. (2023). Pengaruh Fraud Hexagon Theory Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Baand Usaha Milik Negara Di Indonesia Tahun 2017-2021. INNOVATIVE: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3, 10267–10280.

Bawekes, H. F., Simanjuntak, A. M., & Daat, S. C. (2018). Pengaruh Teori Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Reporting (Studi empiris pada perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2011-2015). Jurnal Akuntansi And Keuangan Daerah, 13, 114–134.

Beneish, M. D. (1998). Are Accruals during Initial Public Offerings Opportunistic? Review of Accounting Studies, 3(1/2), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009692703952

Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., Larson, C. R., & Sloan, R. G. (2011). Predicting Material Accounting Misstatements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(1), 17–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01041.x

Evana, E., Metalia, M., Mirfazli, E., Georgieva, D. V., & Sastrodiharjo, I. (2019). Business Ethics in Providing Financial Statements: The Testing of Fraud Pentagon Theory on the Manufacturing Sector in Indonesia. Business Ethics and Leadership, 3(3), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.3(3).68-77.2019

Fabiolla, R. G., Andriyanto, W. A., & Julianto, W. (2021). Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Reporting (Vol. 2).

Faradiza, S. A. (2019). Fraud Pentagon and Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan . EkBis: Jurnal Ekonomi And Bisnis, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.14421/EkBis.2018.2.1.1060

Fauzi, F. T. (2021). Analisis Pemberian Opini Audit Going Concern Selama Pandemi Covid-19 (Studi Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik X Pekanbaru).

Fitriyah, R., & Novita, S. (2021). Fraud Pentagon Theory For Detecting Financial Statement Fraudulent . Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Kontemporer, 13(1), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.23969/jrak.v13i1.3533

Fuad, K., Lestari, A. B., & Handayani, R. T. (2020). Fraud Pentagon as a Measurement Tool for Detecting Financial Statements Fraud. Proceedings of the 17 Th International Symposium on Management (INSYMA 2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200127.017

Handoko, B. L. (2021). Fraud Hexagon dalam Mendeteksi Financial Statement Fraud Perusahaan Perbankan di Indonesia. In Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi (Vol. 5, Issue 2). http://jurnal.ugj.ac.id/index.php/jka

Hugo, J. (2019). Efektivitas Model Beneish M-Score and F-Score dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Ekonomi And Bisnis, 3(1), 165. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmieb.v3i1.2296

Imtikhani, L., & Sukirman. (2021). Determinan Fraudulent Financial Statement Melalui Perspektif Fraud Hexagon Theory Pada Perusahaan Pertambangan. In Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis (Vol. 19, Issue 1).

Inawati, W. A., & Arief, M. A. B. (2022). The Influence of Fraud Hexagon Perspective on Fraud Financial Statement (Case studies on Manufacturing in the Chemical and Basic Industries Sub-Sector Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the Period 2019-2021). www.kemenperin.go.id

Indriani, N., & Rohman, A. (2022). Fraud Triangle and Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Dengan Model Beneish M-Score. In Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis (Vol. 20, Issue 1).

Indriyani, E., & Suryandari, D. (2021). Detection of Fraudulent Financial Statament Through Pentagon Theory With Audit Committee as Moderating. EAJ (Economic and Accounting Journal, 4(1). http://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/EAJhttp://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/EAJ

Irawan, P. A., Susilowati, D., & Puspasari, N. (2019). Detection Analysis On Fraudulent Financial Reporting Using Fraud SCORE Model. SAR (Soedirman Accounting Review) : Journal of Accounting and Business, 4(2), 161. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.sar.2019.4.2.2467

Jamilatuzzahro, & Suditomo, R. (2024). Tren Harga Pangan di Indonesia: Analisis Periode 2018-2024. Equitas FEB UGM.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Kirana, M., Toni, N., Afiezan, A., & Simorangkir, E. N. (2023). Apakah Teori Kecurangan Hexagon Efektif Mencegah Manipulasi Laporan Keuangan Perusahaan BUMN? Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jamal.2023.14.1.06

Kusumawati, A., Sriyono, S., & Heriningsih, S. (2022). Analisis Fraud Hexagon terhadap Financial Statement Fraud Perusahaan Properti Real Estate Terdaftar di BEI 2017-2021. Jurnal Akuntansi And Auditing, 19(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.14710/jaa.19.1.75-93

Kusumosari, L., & Solikhah, B. (2021). Analisis Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Melalui Fraud Hexagon Theory. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi And Keuangan.

Lastanti, H. S., Murwaningsari, E., & Umar, H. (2022). The Effect of Hexagon Fraud on Fraud Financial Statements with Governance and Culture As Moderating Variables. Media Riset Akuntansi, Auditing & Informasi, 22(1), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.25105/mraai.v22i1.13533

Mardianto, M., & Tiono, C. (2019). Analisis Pengaruh Fraud Triangle dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Jurnal Benefita, 1(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.22216/jbe.v1i1.3349

Mulyaningsih, T. (2017). Teori Struktur Pasar: Pendekatan Struktural and Non-Struktural dalam Menganalisis Persaingan di Industri Perbankan. In Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan (Vol. 9, Issue 1).

Nurbaiti, A., & Putri, A. A. (2023). Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Menggunakan Teori Fraud Hexagon. In Jurnal Studi Akuntansi and Keuangan (Vol. 6, Issue 1).

Oktavia, S., Bahari, A., & Kartika, R. (2022). Pengaruh Elemen Fraud Hexagon Theory Terhadap Fraud Laporan Keuangan. Jurnal Akuntansi And Ekonomika, 12(2), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.37859/jae.v12i2.4207

Rae, K., & Subramaniam, N. (2008). Quality of internal control procedures. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(2), 104–124. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900810839820

Ramadhani, P. I. (2023, July 7). Waskita Karya and Wijaya Karya Diduga Manipulasi Laporan Keuangan Bertahun-tahun. Liputan6.Com.

Ratnasari, E., & Solikhah, B. (2019). Analisis Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan: Pendekatan Fraud Pentagon Theory. Gorontalo Accounting Journal, 2(2), 98. https://doi.org/10.32662/gaj.v2i2.621

Sari, M. P., Mahardika, E., Suryandari, D., & Raharja, S. (2022). The audit committee as moderating the effect of hexagon’s fraud on fraudulent financial statements in mining companies listed on the Indonesia stock exchange. Cogent Business and Management, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2150118

Sasongko, N., & Wijayantika, S. F. (2019). Faktor Resiko Fraud Terhadap Pelaksanaan Fraudulent Financial Reporting (Berdasarkan Pendekatan Crown’s Fraud Pentagon Theory). Riset Akuntansi And Keuangan Indonesia, 4(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.23917/reaksi.v4i1.7809

Sebayang, J., Tanjung, A. A., & Ruslan, D. (2021). Respon Kebijakan Moneter Terhadap Pandemi COVID 19. JURNAL DINAMIKA EKONOMI PEMBANGUNAN, 4(2), 140–154. https://doi.org/10.14710/jdep.4.2.140-154

Seniono, L., Nugroho, W., Fe, A., Atma, U., Yogyakarta, J., & Susilo, Y. S. (2007). Struktur Pasar and Perilaku Industri Semen di Indonesia Tahun 2004-2005. In Jurnal Ekonomi and Bisnis Indonesia (Vol. 22, Issue 1).

Septriani, Y., & Desi, H. (2018). Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan dengan Analisis Fraud Pentagon (Vol. 11, Issue 1). http://jurnal.pcr.ac.id

Septriani, Y., & Handayani, D. (2018). Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan dengan Analisis Fraud Pentagon (Vol. 11, Issue 1). http://jurnal.pcr.ac.id

Setyono, D., Hariyanto, E., Wahyuni, S., & Pratama, B. C. (2023a). Penggunaan Fraud Hexagon dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Owner, 7(2), 1036–1048. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v7i2.1325

Setyono, D., Hariyanto, E., Wahyuni, S., & Pratama, B. C. (2023b). Penggunaan Fraud Hexagon dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Owner, 7(2), 1036–1048. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v7i2.1325

Sihombing, K. S., & Rahardjo, S. N. (2014). Analisis Fraud Diamond dalam Mendeteksi Financial Statement Fraud: Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) Tahun 2010-2012. DIPONEGORO JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING, 03, 1–12. http://ejournal-s1.undip.ac.id/index.php/accounting

Sumbari, S., Kamaliah, K., & Fitrios, R. (2023). Analisis Model Fraud Hexagon dalam Mendeteksi Potensi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan pada Perusahaan BUMN. CURRENT: Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi And Bisnis Terkini, 4(1), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.31258/current.4.1.179-196

Takakobi, R. B. (2022). Fraud Diamond dalam Memprediksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan pada Perusahaan Perbankan di BEI.

Tarjo, T., Anggono, A., & Sakti, E. (2021). Detecting Indications of Financial Statement Fraud: a Hexagon Fraud Theory Approach. AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi, 13(1), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.26740/jaj.v13n1.p119-131

Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing theory of fraud: the S.C.O.R.E. model. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2017-0128

Yusuf, M., Tarmizi, M. I., & Maryati, M. (2023). Determinan Asumsi Going Concern dalam Pemberian Opini Audit. Jurnal Akuntansi And Governance, 4(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.24853/jago.4.1.56-72

Zilhadia. (2020). Kejadian Luar Biasa COVID-19, Sebuah Tinjauan Literatur Secara Singkat. Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences Journal, 2 (1), 19–26.

Diterbitkan

18-08-2025

Cara Mengutip

Az Zahra, S. N., & Irawan, F. (2025). The effect of pressure, opportunity, rationalization, capability, arrogance, and collusion on fraudulent financial statement. Educoretax, 5(7), 870–887. https://doi.org/10.54957/educoretax.v5i7.1720

Terbitan

Bagian

Articles

Artikel paling banyak dibaca berdasarkan penulis yang sama

<< < 1 2