International tax dispute resolution through mutual agreement procedure in Indonesia: Past, present, and future
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54957/educoretax.v4i9.1055Kata Kunci:
BEPS Action 14, International taxation, Mutual agreement procedure, Tax dispute resolution, Transfer pricingAbstrak
Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) is widely recognized as an international tax dispute resolution mechanism to resolve double taxation among jurisdictions, generally governed under Article 25 of double taxation agreements. To strengthen the effectiveness and efficiency of MAP, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) released the BEPS Action 14 report. To adapt to international best practices and peer-review recommendations, Indonesia, under the Directorate General of Taxes (DGT) Ministry of Finance of Indonesia, enacted several changes to its MAP domestic rules. This study aims to provide an analysis of developments of MAP regulations in Indonesia and to analyze its implementation to relieve double taxation and to adapt to both international best practices and international examinations through peer review in the Forum on Tax Administrations (FTA) on MAP. The author uses a doctrinal-empirical method with a historical approach with data set from 2016 to 2022. The findings indicate that Indonesia has had positive developments in its legal framework and practices in successfully concluding many MAP cases within the recommended time frame of 24 months. To enhance MAP in the future, DGT needs to deliver detailed guidance on multilateral MAP, to provide a secure transparent digitalized administration system to both treaty partners and taxpayers, and to be aware of MAP arbitration with the recent development of global consensus under Two-Pillar Solution.
Referensi
Altman, Z. D. (2005). Dispute Resolution under Tax Treaties (Vol. 11). IBFD – Academic Council. https://doi.org/https://www.ibfd.org/product/44/download/pdf
Avi-Yonah, R. (2022). The Single Tax Principle. University of Michigan Public Law Research Paper, 22–24. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4121180
Baistrocchi, E. (2017). Patterns of Tax Treaty Disputes: A Global Taxonomy. Chapter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1351–1456. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316528945.031
Baker, P. L. (2014). An Analysis of Double Taxation Treaties and their Effect on Foreign Direct Investment. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 21(3), 341–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/13571516.2014.968454
Barthel, F., Busse, M., & Neumayer, E. (2010). The Impact of Double Taxation Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from Large Dyadic Panel Data. Contemporary Economic Policy, 28(3), 366–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.2009.00185.x
Becker, J., Blank, M., Blank, A., & Cordewener, A. (2022). Klaus Vogel on Double Taxation Conventions 4th revised edition Order (4th ed.). Wolters Kluwer Law International. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=3150733
Brauner, Y. (2020). International Tax Treaty Dispute Resolution, The Mutual Agreement Procedure, and The Promise of Mandatory Arbitration For Developing Countries. Research Handbook on International Taxation. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788975377.00024
Cahyono, R. (2022). The Effect of Tax Treaty on Foreign Direct Invesment Activity: Indonesia Overview. JEMASI: Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 18(8.5.2022), 49–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35449/jemasi.v18i1.524
Chandrasari, P. Y. (2021). The Impact of Tax Treaty on Foreign Direct Investment in Indonesia. Jurnal BPPK, 14(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.48108/jurnalbppk.v14i1
Dimitropoulou, C., Govind, S., & Turcan, L. (2018). Applying Modern, Disruptive Technologies to Improve the Effectiveness of Tax Treaty Dispute Resolution: Part 1. Intertax, 11, 856–872. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2018093
Douma, S. (2014). Legal Research in International and EU Tax Law. In Kluwer – Deventer. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2997210
Hughes, J., & Palacheck, D. (2017). Improving Mutual Agreement Procedures. Tax Administration 2017: Comparative Information on OECD and Other Advanced and Emerging Economies. OECD Publishing, Paris, 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1787/tax_admin-2017-18-en
Ilham, M., & Widiastuti, B. (2022). Hambatan Penyelesaian Sengketa Transfer Pricing Melalui Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) Di Indonesia. Educoretax, 2(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.54957/educoretax.v2i1.129
Jogarajan, S. (2020). The origins of the International Tax Regime. Research Handbook on International Taxation. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788975377.00012
Lang, M. (2021). Introduction to the Law of Double Taxation Conventions (3rd ed.). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59403/19zghav
Lang, M., & Owens, J. P. (2014). The Role of Tax Treaties in Facilitating Development and Protecting the Tax Base. WU International Research Paper Series, 03, 1–203. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2398438
Li, J. Bao, N, J. Hu, S. Hu, W. Zerbino, M. (2020). Digitalization on International Tax Dispute Resolution: A Window of Opportunity for BRITACOM.
Markham. (2019). Arbitration and tax treaty disputes. Arbitration International, 35(4), 473–504. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiz023
Markham. (2022). Action 14 of the BEPS Project: Taking the Pulse of Tax Certainty and Determining the Effectiveness of the Peer Review Process Five Years On. Bulletin for International Taxation, 76(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59403/3ms96jy
Markham. (2023). The Timely Resolution of Mutual Agreement Procedure Disputes – Secrets of Success? Bulletin for International Taxation, 77(5). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59403/3mds71d
McKinsey. (2018). A Vision for the Future of Cross-border Payments. In Global Banking Practice. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Industries/Financial Services/Our Insights/A vision for the future of cross border payments final/A-vision-for-the-future-of-cross-border-payments-web-final.ashx
OECD. (2015). Making Dispute Resolution Mechanisms More Effective, Action 14 - 2015 Final Report. In OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264241633-en
OECD. (2016). Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent BEPS. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://www.oecd.org/tax/treaties/multilateral-convention-to-implement-tax-treaty-related-measures-to-prevent-BEPS.pdf
OECD. (2019). Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Indonesia (Stage 1): Inclusive Framework on BEPS: Action 14, OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project. In OECD Publishing, Paris (Issue Stage 1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/deb42398-en
OECD. (2020). Tax Challenges Arising from Digitalisation – Report on Pillar One Blueprint: Inclusive Framework on BEPS. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://www.oecd.org/tax/beps/tax-challenges-arising-from-digitalisation-report-on-pillar-one-blueprint.pdf
OECD. (2021). Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Indonesia (Stage 2): Inclusive Framework on BEPS Action 14. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/8095f743-en
OECD. (2022). OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations. In OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/0e655865-en
OECD. (2023a). BEPS Action 14 on More Effective Dispute Resolution Mechanisms – Peer Review Documents, OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project. OECD Publishing, Paris. www.oecd.org/tax/beps/beps-action-14-on-more-effective-dispute-resolution-peer-reviewdocuments.pdf
OECD. (2023b). Making Dispute Resolution Mechanisms More Effective – Consolidated Information on Mutual Agreement Procedures 2023. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/69b789e7-en
OECD. (2023c). Manual on the Handling of Multilateral Mutual Agreement Procedures and Advance Pricing Arrangements. OECD Forum on Tax Administration, OECD, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/f0cad7f3-en
OECD. (2024). Developing Effective Online Dispute Resolution in Latvia. In OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/75ef5c4c-en
Pietro, C. D. (2015). Tax treaty Override and the Need for Coordination between Legal Systems: Safeguarding the Effectiveness of International Law. World Tax Journal, 7(1), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.59403/2nntvyx
Satrio, H. N., & Lestari, N. I. (2018). The Effect of Tax Treaty on Foreign Direct Investment in Indonesia. JABI (Jurnal Akuntansi Berkelanjutan Indonesia), 1(3), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.32493/jabi.v1i3.y2018.p278-288
Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (History of). https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/econ/ugcm/3ll3/smith/wealth/index.html
United Nations. (1969). Vienna Convention on The Law of Treaties Vienna, Treaty Series, Chapter XXIII. Conference Des Nations Unies Sur Le Droit Des Traites, 2. https://treaties.un.org/doc/Treaties/1980/01/19800127 00-52 AM/Ch_XXIII_01.pdf
Webley, L. (2010). Qualitative Approaches to Empirical Legal Research. The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research, January 2010, 927–950. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199542475.013.0039
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2024 Defi Defi
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
