Analysis of intent to use artificial intelligence in tax assistance based on the modified UTAUT2 model

Authors

  • Aji Fajar Suryo Antoro Universitas Terbuka
  • Abdurrahman Rahim Tha Universitas Terbuka
  • Muhtarom Universitas Terbuka
  • Dedy Juniadi Universitas Terbuka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54957/educoretax.v6i4.2110

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Intention to Use, Tax Assistance, Technology Adoption, UTAUT2 Model

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the factors influencing taxpayers' intention to use artificial intelligence (AI) for tax assistance in Indonesia. The research design employed a quantitative approach with an explanatory survey method of 200 respondents who had used AI tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini, or similar tools for tax assistance. The UTAUT2 model was modified by adding the Trust in AI construct and removing the Use Behavior construct. Data analysis was performed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) using SmartPLS 4. The results showed that habit, performance expectancy, price value, and trust in AI significantly influenced behavioral intention, while effort expectancy, facilitating conditions, social influence, and hedonic motivation were insignificant. These findings confirm that intention to use AI in taxation is more influenced by practical experience and perceived value than by convenience or social influence. A limitation of this study is that it did not measure actual behavior; therefore, further research is recommended to examine this aspect. This study provides theoretical contributions to the development of AI adoption models in taxation, as well as practical implications for tax authorities and technology providers.

References

Arianty, F. (2023). Modernization of Tax Administration in DJP Online Service in Terms of Efficiency Principle. 772–782. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-132-6_66

Choung, H., David, P., & Ross, A. (2023). Trust in AI and Its Role in the Acceptance of AI Technologies. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 39(9), 1727–1739. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2050543

Cotrina-Reyes, M., Vera, V. D. A., Vásquez, M. E. M., Navarro-Baldeón, P., & Vela, S. L. R. (2025). Evolution of Virtual Assistance in the Interaction Between Taxpayers and Tax. 122–141. https://doi.org/10.37885/250218824

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of E-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101

Meiranto, W., Farlyagiza, F., Faisal, F., Yuyetta, E. N. A., & Puspitasari, E. (2024). The mediating role of behavioral intention on factors influencing user behavior in the E-government state financial application system at the Indonesian Ministry of Finance. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2373341. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2373341

Mohammed, S. D., Mas’ud, A., Karaye, Y. I., Sallau, M. M., Adam, A. D., & Sulaiman, B. A. (2023). Evaluation of Tax Digitalization Efforts by Federal Inland Revenue Service and Their Impacts on Tax Collection 2002-2021. Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 3(2), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.47747/jat.v3i2.1138

Murnidayanti, S. A., & Putranti, T. M. (2023). The Effectiveness of Digitizing Tax Administration to Reduce the Compliance Cost of Taxpayers of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs). Jurnal Public Policy, 9(2), 91. https://doi.org/10.35308/jpp.v9i2.6561

Pramesti, R. F., & Emalia, D. (2024). Studi Literatur : Artificial Inteligence Dalam Dunia Perpajakan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis Manajemen Dan Akuntansi (Jebma), 4(3), 1338–1350. https://doi.org/10.47709/jebma.v4i3.4661

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412

Yasar, M., Nurhidayat, M. R., & Rizky, A. (2025). The Future of Tax Services: Coretax as a Technology-Based Breakthrough. Educoretax, 5(5), 610–623. https://doi.org/10.54957/educoretax.v5i5.1593

Yip, A., & Fong, J. (2025). Responsible AI in Tax Filing: Legal and Ethical Challenges of LLM-Based Assistants. Fair, 2(1), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.71465/fair271

Downloads

Published

2026-05-20

How to Cite

Antoro, A. F. S., Tha, A. R., Muhtarom, & Juniadi, D. . (2026). Analysis of intent to use artificial intelligence in tax assistance based on the modified UTAUT2 model. Educoretax, 6(4), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.54957/educoretax.v6i4.2110

Issue

Section

Articles