Pengungkapan Aspek Sosial Sesuai Standar GRI 400 Versus Kepercayaan Pemangku Kepentingan

Rizky Amalia; Andy Novendra  Kharisma; Amrie Firmansyah

doi:10.54957/akuntansiku.v3i3.672

Authors

Rizky Amalia Politeknik Keuangan Negara STAN
Andy Novendra Kharisma Politeknik Keuangan Negara STAN
Amrie Firmansyah Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54957/akuntansiku.v3i3.672

Keywords:

GRI 400, SDGs, Social Sustainability

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengulas keinformatifan dan komparabilitas indikator pelaporan non-keuangan pada aspek sosial perusahaan dalam melakukan bisnis sesuai dengan Standar Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). Selain itu, penelitian ini juga mengulas keselarasan indikator GRI 400 (topik sosial) dalam mendukung ketercapaian Sustainable Deveopment Goals (SDGs). Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah scoping review dan analisis konten. Scoping review dilakukan dengan cara melakukan identifikasi literatur dari berbagai sumber referensi yang berkaitan dengan GRI 400. Sementara itu, analisis konten digunakan untuk menambahkan informasi pengungkapan yang diperlukan dalam ulasan pembahasan. Hasil penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa indikator GRI 400 telah mendukung ketercapaian SDGs. Penelitian ini juga memberikan usulan beberapa indikator dalam seri GRI 400 secara kuantitatif dan biaya. Hasil penelitian ini diharapkan bermanfaat untuk para pemangku kebijakan lokal untuk mempertimbangkan usulan tambahan informasi yang diungkapkan dalam laporan keberlanjutan dan dapat menambah kepercayaan para pemangku kepentingan atas laporan keberlanjutan yang disajikan.

References

Albers, C., & Günther, T. (2010). Disclose or not disclose: determinants of social reporting for STOXX Europe 600 firms. Zeitschrift für Planung & Unternehmenssteuerung, 21, 323-347.

Aureli, S., Gigli, S., Medei, R., & Supino, E. (2020). The value relevance of environmental, social, and governance disclosure: Evidence from Dow Jones Sustainability World Index listed companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 43-52.

Aureli, S., Magnaghi, E., & Salvatori, F. (2019). The role of existing regulation and discretion in harmonising non- financial disclosure. Accounting in Europe, 16(3), 290–312. doi:10.1080/17449480.2019.1637529.

Anggraeni, D. Y., & Djakman, C. D. (2018). Pengujian terhadap kualitas pengungkapan CSR di Indonesia. Ekuitas: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan, 2(1), 22-41. Surabaya: Sekolah Tinggi ilmu Ekonomi Indonesia (STIESIA).

BPK RI. (2021). Laporan Berkelanjutan BPK tahun 2020. Jakarta: Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan. https://www.bpk.go.id/page/laporan-berkelanjutan-bpk

Brown, H. S., de Jong, M., & Levy, D. L. (2009). Building institutions based on information disclosure: lessons from GRI's sustainability reporting. Journal of cleaner production, 17(6), 571-580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.12.009

Cappuyns, V. (2016). Inclusion of social indicators in decision support tools for the selection of sustainable site remediation options. Journal of Environmental Management, 184(1), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.035

Carnevale, C., Mazzuca, M., & Venturini, S. (2012). Corporate social reporting in European banks: The effects on a firm's market value. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, 19(3), 159-177. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.262

Chersan, I.-C. (2016). Corporate responsibility reporting according to Global Reporting Initiative: an international comparison. Audit Financiar, 14(4-136), 424-435. http://dx.doi.org/10.20869/AUDITF/2016/136/424

Crisóstomo, V. L., Prudêncio, P. D. A., & Forte, H. C. (2017). An analysis of the adherence to GRI for disclosing information on social action and sustainability concerns. In Advances in Environmental Accounting & Management: Social and Environmental Accounting in Brazil (pp. 69-103). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-359820160000006002

Deegan, C. (2004). Financial accounting theory. Australia: McGraw-Hill Education.

Devi, S., Budiasih, I. G. N., dan Bedera, I. D. N. (2017). Pengaruh pengungkapan enterprise risk management dan pengungkapan intellectual capital terhadap nilai perusahaan. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 14(1), 20–45. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2017.02

Farhana, S., & Adelina, Y. E. (2019). Relevansi nilai laporan keberlanjutan di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 10(3), 615-628. http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.jamal.2019.10.3.36

GRI. (2016). GRI Standards. Amsterdam: Global Sustainability Standards Board (GSSB).

Henriques, A. (2010). Corporate impact: Measuring and managing your social footprint. Earthscan. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781849774901

Jones, P., Comfort, D., & Hillier, D. (2016). Managing materiality: a preliminary examination of the adoption of the new GRI G4 guidelines on materiality within the business community. Journal of Public Affairs, 16(3), 222-230. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1586

Kresentia, I. (2017). Pengaruh pengungkapan Islamic corporate social responsibility terhadap agresivitas pajak pada perusahaan yang terdaftar di Jakarta Islamic Index (JII) periode 2012-2015. (Thesis Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta). http://e-journal.uajy.ac.id/12939/.

Lapointe-Antunes, P., Cormier, D., Magnan, M., & Gay-Angers, S. (2006). On the relationship between voluntary disclosure, earnings smoothing and the value-relevance of earnings: The case of Switzerland. European accounting review, 15(4), 465-505. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180601102040

Luffarelli, J., & Awaysheh, A. (2018). The impact of indirect corporate social performance signals on firm value: Evidence from an event study. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(3), 295-310. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1468

Martens, W. & Bui, C.N.M. (2023) An exploration of legitimacy theory in accounting literature. Open Access Library Journal, 10, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1109713

Massa, L., Farneti, F., & Scappini, B. (2015). Developing a sustainability report in a small to medium enterprise: process and consequences. Meditari Accountancy Research, 23(1), 62-91. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-02-2014-0030

Michalczuk, G., & Konarzewska, U. (2020). Standardization of corporate social responsibility reporting using the GRI framework. Optimum. Economic Studies, (1 (99), 74-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.15290/oes.2020.01.99.06

Moneva, J. M., Archel, P., & Correa, C. (2006). GRI and the camouflaging of corporate unsustainability. Accounting Forum, (30)2, 121-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2006.02.001.

Mysaka, H., & Derun, I. (2022). GRI 400 as a Contemporary tool to increase trust in corporate social responsibility. Calitatea, 23(187), 256-270. https://doi.org/10.47750/QAS/23.187.32

Needles, B. E., Frigo, M. L., Powers, M., & Shigaev, A. (2016). Integrated reporting and sustainability reporting: An exploratory study of high performance companies. Performance measurement and management control: Contemporary issues, 31, 41-81. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-351220160000031019

Orlitzky, M. (2005). Social responsibility and financial performance: Trade-off or virtuous circle. University of Auckland Business Review, 7(1), 37-43. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284499852_Social_responsibility_and_financial_performance_Trade-off_or_virtuous_circle

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students eight edition. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal.

Spence, L. J., Agyemang, G., & Rinaldi, L. (2012). Environmental aspects of sustainability: SMEs and the role of the accountant. Association of Chartered Certified Accountants.

Tschopp, D., & Nastanski, M. (2014). The harmonization and convergence of corporate social responsibility reporting standards. Journal of business ethics, 125, 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1906-9

UN Global Compact (n.d.). Sosial sustainability. https://unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/our-work/social

Utomo, A. S. 2019. Pengaruh csr, roi, roe terhadap harga saham pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di bursa efek Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Teori & Terapan Akuntansi (PETA), 4(1), 82-94. https://doi.org/10.51289/peta.v4i1.377

WACOSS. (2023). 2022 sustainable funding survey report. https://www.wacoss.org.au/library/2022-sustainable-funding-survey-report/

Wilburn, K., & Wilburn, R. (2013). Using global reporting initiative indicators for CSR programs. Journal of Global responsibility, 4(1), 62-75. https://doi.org/10.1108/20412561311324078

Willis, A. (2003). The role of the global reporting initiative's sustainability reporting guidelines in the social screening of investments. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 233-237. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022958618391