Domestic politics and the reorientation of the look east policy in the era of President Ebrahim Raisi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54957/jolas.v6i1.2062Keywords:
Bureaucratic politics, Domestic politics, Ideational power, Iranian foreign policy, Look East PolicyAbstract
This article analyzes the formation of Iran’s Look East Policy under the presidency of Ebrahim Raisi by positioning domestic politics as the primary explanatory variable. Departing from approaches that interpret the policy as a reactive response to Western pressure and international sanctions, the article argues that Look East Policy constitutes a structurally produced domestic political outcome. The study employs a layered analytical framework combining ideational power and the bureaucratic politics model within the tradition of Foreign Policy Analysis (FPA), using qualitative library-based research methods. The findings show that the ideological structure constructed by the Supreme Leader shapes the foreign policy legitimacy space (policy space), which is subsequently translated into institutional preferences and consolidated through bureaucratic interactions among the president, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and the IRGC. This process produces elite consensus that is crystallized through policy formulation, transforming Look East Policy into an official strategic orientation and institutionalizing it through bilateral relations, non-Western multilateralism, and sectoral cooperation. The article concludes that Look East Policy is a policy ideologically conditioned, bureaucratically produced, and institutionally embedded, in which Western external pressure functions as a triggering context, while domestic political structures determine the direction and character of Iran’s foreign policy.
References
Allison, G., & Zelikow, P. (1999). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis (2nd ed.). Longman.
Azad, S. (2022). Looking-East in the Iranian Foreign Policy: The Politico-Ideological Inclinations and Practical Imperatives. Journal of Globalization Studies, 13(2), 53–75. https://doi.org/10.30884/jogs/2022.02.04
Bennett, A., & Checkel, J. T. (2015). Process tracing and the social sciences: From metaphor to analytic tool. Cambridge University Press.
Blyth, M. (2002). Great transformations: Economic ideas and institutional change in the twentieth century. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489046
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln, Eds.; 3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Esfandiary, D., & Tabatabai, A. (2022). Triple-axis: Iran’s relations with Russia and China. I.B. Tauris.
Farzanegan, M. R., & Raeisian Parvari, M. (2014). Iranian-Oil-Free Zone and international oil prices. Energy Economics, 45, 364–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.08.004
George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press.
Haidar, J. I. (2017). Sanctions and export deflection: evidence from Iran. Economic Policy, 32(90), 319–355.
Hay, C. (2002). Political analysis: A critical introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.
Hudson, V. M. (2005). Foreign policy analysis: Actor-specific theory and the ground of international relations. Foreign Policy Analysis, 1(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2005.00001.x
Hunter, S. (2010). Iran’s foreign policy in the post-Soviet era: Resisting the new international order. Praeger.
Hunter, S., & Jones, J. (2018). Iran’s foreign policy in the post-Soviet era. Praeger.
Kaarbo, J. (2015). A foreign policy analysis perspective on the domestic politics turn in IR theory. International Studies Review, 17(2), 189–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/misr.12213
Kamrava, M. (2012). Iran’s political economy of resistance. Middle East Policy, 19(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4967.2012.00542.x
Katzman, K. (2020). Iran’s Foreign and Defense Policies. https://crsreports.congress.gov
Klotz, A., & Prakash, D. (2008). Qualitative Methods in International Relations: A Pluralist Guide (A. Klotz & D. Prakash, Eds.). Palgrave Macmillan.
Pape, R. A. (2005). Soft Balancing against the United States. International Security, 30(1), 7–45.
Peksen, D. (2019). When Do Imposed Economic Sanctions Work? A Critical Review of the Sanctions Effectiveness Literature. Defence and Peace Economics, 30(6), 635–647. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2019.1625250
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Torbat, A. E. (2005). Impacts of the US Trade & Financial Sanctions on Iran. The World Economy, 28(3), 407–434.
Vakil, S. (2022, September 28). Iran protests highlight its crisis of legitimacy. Https://Www.Chathamhouse.Org/2022/09/Iran-Protests-Highlight-Its-Crisis-Legitimacy.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Asep Kamaluddin Nashir, Rizky Hikmawan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








