Business interests above human lives: An analysis of business-related violations in the Kanjuruhan tragedy from a human rights perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54957/jolas.v6i4.2254Keywords:
Business and Human Rights, Corporate Negligence, Kanjuruhan Tragedy, UN Guiding PrinciplesAbstract
The Kanjuruhan Tragedy of 1 October 2022 represents a significant human rights incident that exposed weaknesses in business governance within Indonesia’s sports industry. The event, which resulted in hundreds of deaths and injuries, highlighted the tension between commercial interests and the responsibility to protect human rights. This study aims to examine the business and human rights dimensions of the Kanjuruhan Tragedy through the framework of the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and human rights (UNGPs) and Presidential Regulation Number 60 of 2023 concerning the National Strategy on Business and human rights. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Data were collected through a literature review of legal instruments, official documents, investigation reports, and relevant academic sources. The findings indicate that the scheduling of the match to accommodate prime-time television broadcasting contributed to excessive crowd density and heightened safety risks. Furthermore, the study identifies failures by business actors and related stakeholders to implement adequate human rights due diligence, risk mitigation measures, and crowd management practices. These shortcomings demonstrate the absence of effective safeguards required under contemporary business and human rights standards. The study concludes that stronger corporate accountability mechanisms, effective implementation of human rights due diligence, and the integration of business and human rights principles into sports event governance are necessary to prevent similar incidents in the future and to ensure greater protection of fundamental rights.
References
Agustin, E. A. T., et al. (2025). Pelanggaran HAM dalam Tragedi Kanjuruhan 2022: Perspektif keadilan dan perlindungan hak asasi manusia. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 2(6), 206–213.
Agustinus, D. (2023). Analisis tindakan represif aparat kepolisian dalam pengontrolan massa: Studi kasus Tragedi Kanjuruhan Malang. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat, 21(1), 105–116.
Delyarahmi, S., & Siagian, A. W. (2023). Perlindungan terhadap supporter sepak bola ditinjau dari perspektif hak asasi manusia: Studi kasus Tragedi Kanjuruhan. UNES Journal of Swara Justisia, 7(1), 89–102.
Fédération Internationale de Football Association. (2017). FIFA human rights policy. FIFA. Fédération Internationale de Football Association. (2021). FIFA safety and security regulations. FIFA.
Fédération Internationale de Football Association. (2024). FIFA statutes (2024 ed.). FIFA. Ibrahim, J. (2021). Teori dan metodologi penelitian hukum normatif. Bayumedia Publishing.
Indonesia. (1999). Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1999 Nomor 165.
Indonesia. (2005). Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2005 tentang Pengesahan International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2005 Nomor 119.
Indonesia. (2022). Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2022 tentang Keolahragaan. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2022 Nomor 63.
Indonesia. (2023). Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2023 Nomor 1.
Indonesia. (2023). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 60 Tahun 2023 tentang Strategi Nasional Bisnis dan Hak Asasi Manusia.
Komisi Nasional Hak Asasi Manusia. (2022). Hasil investigasi Tragedi Kanjuruhan. Komnas HAM.
Maleske, C. L., & Sant, S.-L. (2025). Examining the development of human rights strategies for large-scale sport events: The case of the United Bid for the FIFA Men's World Cup 2026. European Sport Management Quarterly, 25(4), 515–534.
Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Penelitian hukum (Edisi revisi). Kencana.
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2008). Clarifying the concepts of “sphere of influence” and “complicity” (A/HRC/8/16). United Nations.
Ruggie, J. G. (2007). Business and human rights: The evolving international agenda. American Journal of International Law, 101(4), 819–840. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0002930000037730
Ruggie, J. G. (2011). Guiding principles on business and human rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” framework (A/HRC/17/31). United Nations Human Rights Council.
Ruggie, J. G. (2013). Just business: Multinational corporations and human rights. W. W. Norton & Company.
Sant, S.-L., Maleske, C. L., & Vanderpool, K. (2024). Research on human rights and large-scale sport events from 1990 to 2022: A scoping review. Sport Management Review, 27(1), 23–45.
Tim Gabungan Independen Pencari Fakta. (2022). Laporan hasil investigasi Tragedi Kanjuruhan. Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Politik, Hukum, dan Keamanan.
United Nations Human Rights Council. (2011). Human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises (Resolution 17/4). United Nations.
Utama, K. W., Sukmadewi, Y. D., Saraswati, R., & Putrijanti, A. (2022). Tragedi Kanjuruhan dan penyalahgunaan wewenang dalam pelaksanaan prosedur administrasi negara. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 51(4), 421–435.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Ammar Darmaputra

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








