The effect of capital intensity and institutional ownership on tax avoidance, with gender diversity as a moderating variable

Authors

  • Nada Asyfa Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
  • Suparna Wijaya Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54957/educoretax.v6i7.2307

Keywords:

Banking Sector, Capital Intensity, Gender Diversity, Institutional Ownership, Tax Avoidance

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of capital intensity and institutional ownership on tax avoidance, and to examine the role of gender diversity as a moderating variable in banking sub-sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the 2020–2024 period. Tax avoidance is proxied by the Cash Effective Tax Rate (CETR), while capital intensity is measured by the ratio of fixed assets to total assets and institutional ownership by the percentage of shares held by institutions. Gender diversity is measured by the ratio of female directors to the total number of board members, with liquidity as a control variable. This study employs a quantitative approach using panel data regression on 214 observations selected through purposive sampling, processed with STATA 17, in which the Fixed Effects Model was selected as the estimation model with robust standard errors correction. The results show that capital intensity has a positive and significant effect on tax avoidance, whereas institutional ownership has no significant effect. Gender diversity is proven to moderate and weaken the effect of capital intensity on tax avoidance, but it cannot moderate the relationship between institutional ownership and tax avoidance. These findings imply that fixed-asset characteristics play a greater role in influencing corporate tax strategies, while the presence of women on the board of directors can enhance prudence and internal oversight of tax policy in capital-intensive firms. This study is expected to contribute empirically to the tax accounting literature and serve as a reference for regulators and practitioners in formulating tax policies and corporate governance practices.

References

Anggelina, B., Trisnawati, E., & Firmansyah, A. (2022). Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Tax Aggressiveness: Bagaimana Pengaruh Board Gender Diversity? E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 32(4), 912–927. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2022.v32.i04.p07

Anggriantari, C. D., & Purwantini, A. H. (2020). Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Capital Intensity, Inventory Intensity, Dan Leverage Pada Penghindaran Pajak. 3rd Prosiding Business and Economics Conference In Utilizing of Modern Technology 2020, 137–153.

Baltagi, B. H. (2021). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (6th ed.). Department of Economics and The Center for Policy Research, Syracuse University. http://www.springer.com/series/10099

Chrysilla, J., & Sandra, A. (2023). Determinan Indikasi Tax Avoidance Perusahaan Multinasional. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Dharma Andalas, 25(2), 625–641. https://doi.org/10.47233/jebd.v25i2.440

Darsani, P. A., & Sukartha, I. M. (2021). The Effect of Institutional Ownership, Profitability, Leverage and Capital Intensity Ratio on Tax Avoidance. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research (AJHSSR), 5(1), 13–22. www.ajhssr.com

Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic Econometrics (A. E. Hilbert & N. Fox, Eds.; 5th ed.). Douglas Reiner.

Hamilton, L. C. (2013). Statistics with STATA Updated for Version 12 (M. Taylor, S. W. Hogan, A. Gontar, & A. Coppola, Eds.). Richard Stratton.

Hanim, F., & Adi, S. W. (2022). Pengaruh Size, Profitability, Leverage, Capital Intensity Dan Komisaris Independen Terhadap Effective Tax Rate Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Di Indonesia Tahun 2016-2019. Eqien - Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 9(1), 337–347.

Hapsoro, D., & Falih, Z. N. (2020). The Effect of Firm Size, Profitability, and Liquidity on The Firm Value Moderated by Carbon Emission Disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 21(2), 240–257. https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.2102147

Hartati, N. (2020). Pengaruh Dewan Komisaris, Komite Audit dan Kepemilikan Institusional Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan. EKOMABIS: Jurnal

Ekonomi Manajemen Bisnis, 1(2), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.37366/ekomabis.v1i02.72

IBCWE. (2023). Peluncuran Penelitian Board Gender Diversity. Indonesia Business Coalition for Women Empowerment.

Ishak, A. C., & Asalam, A. G. (2023). Pengaruh Koneksi Politik, Capital Intensity, dan Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Terhadap Tax Avoidance. Owner: Riset & Jurnal Akuntansi, 7(4), 2041–3051. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v7i4.1720

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm : Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.

Kementerian Keuangan Indonesia. (2025). Kinerja Pendapatan Negara Tahun 2024 Tumbuh Positif. Kementerian Keuangan Indonesia. https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/informasi-publik/publikasi/berita-utama/Pendapatan-Negara-Tahun-2024-Tumbuh-Positif

Kurnia, & Wagisuwari, K. S. (2023). The Influence of Gender Diversity, Proportion of Independent Commissioners, Managerial Ability, and Company Size on Tax Avoidance. Jurnal Akuntansi Aktual, 10(2), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.17977/um004v10i22023p114

Kurniawan, R. (2023, October). Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Capital Intensity, Inventory Intensity, dan Sales Growth Terhadap Tax Avoidance (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Subsektor Perdagangan Eceran yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2018 – 2022). Prosiding: Ekonomi Dan Bisnis.

Muslim, A. I., & Setiawan, D. (2024). View of institutional ownership and value relevance in Indonesia: the nexus of accounting conservatism. Rajagiri Management Journal, 18(3), 251–263. https://doi.org/10.1108/ramj-05-2023-0137

OECD. (2025). Revenue Statistics in Asia and the Pacific 2025. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/6c04402f-en

Reswita, Y., Lukman, S., Febrianto, R., & Adrianto, F. (2024). Tax Avoidance on Institutional Ownership: Case Study of Banking Companies in Indonesian Capital Market. Jurnal Manajemen Universitas Bung Hatta, 19(02), 188–198.

Sambuaga, E. A., & Felicia, D. (2024). The Effect of Women’s Role on Board, ESG Performance, and Tax Avoidance. Society, 12(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v12i1.651

Situmorang, P. L., & Siahaan, R. L. M. (2024). Analisis Hubungan Inflasi dan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi, Akuntansi, Dan Pajak (JIEAP), 1(2), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.61132/jieap.v1i2.158

Sulistyawati, A., & Rahmawati, A. I. E. (2024). Determinants Of Tax Avoidance: Gender Diversity, Capital Intensity, Audit Committee, And Board Size. ULTIMA Accounting, 16(1), 152–170.

Switariyani, M. D., Dewi, L. G. K., & Vijaya, D. P. (2025). Studi Komparatif Aspek Literasi Keuangan Perempuan Bali dan Perempuan Non-Bali terhadap Keberlangsungan Usaha di Kecamatan Buleleng. Vokasi: Jurnal Riset Akuntansi, 14(2), 19–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/vjra.v14i2.97847

Tax Justice Network. (2024). State of Tax Justice 2024. https://taxjustice.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/State-of-Tax-Justice-2024-English-Tax-Justice-Network.pdf

Widiani, V., & Trisnawati, E. (2024). The Impact of Transfer Pricing, Capital Intensity, Thin Capitalization on Tax Avoidance with Sales Growth as Moderating Variabel in Pharmaceutical and Health Companies Listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange 2017-2022. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 7(3), 110–123. https://jayapanguspress.penerbit.org/index.php/ganaya110

Downloads

Published

2026-07-06

How to Cite

Asyfa, N., & Wijaya, S. (2026). The effect of capital intensity and institutional ownership on tax avoidance, with gender diversity as a moderating variable. Educoretax, 6(7), 472–482. https://doi.org/10.54957/educoretax.v6i7.2307

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >>