The paradox of regional investment in regional-owned enterprises: Implications of capital participation for local own-source revenue and the strategic role of internal auditors - evidence from regional-owned enterprises in Central Sulawesi Province

Naela Zaqiyatul Misqiyah; Nural Achmad Raainaa

doi:10.54957/jurnalku.v6i2.2299

Penulis

Naela Zaqiyatul Misqiyah Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan
Nural Achmad Raainaa Direktorat Jenderal Pajak

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54957/jurnalku.v6i2.2299

Abstrak

Regional government officials are often confronted with a contradiction between high levels of government investment and the limited financial returns generated for Local Own-Source Revenue (PAD). This phenomenon reflects a gap between the objective of regional capital participation as an instrument for strengthening the local economy and the reality of the still-low contribution of Regional-Owned Enterprises (BUMD) to regional revenue. This qualitative study, employing a literature review approach, aims to examine the anomaly of capital capitalization in BUMD within Central Sulawesi Province and to formulate the role of internal auditors in addressing this issue. The analysis was conducted through a review of regional government financial statements, BUMD capital participation and dividend data, relevant regulations, and various literature related to regional corporate governance and internal auditing. The explanatory findings indicate that BUMD have not yet been able to formulate a rigid and sustainable business model and have failed to optimize public value following capital injections. This condition is reflected in the low contribution of dividends to PAD, the high dependence on a single productive BUMD entity, and the existence of regional enterprises that continue to incur losses despite receiving significant capital support from the regional government. This situation indicates weak implementation of corporate governance, an unclear business direction, and the still-limited effectiveness of oversight mechanisms. To address this governance urgency, internal auditors occupy a strategic position as catalysts for organizational change. The acceleration of BUMD performance can be achieved through the establishment of a structured intervention model encompassing diagnostic audits, governance assessments, business feasibility reviews, performance monitoring systems, and strategic recommendations. This model is expected to encourage the transformation of BUMD from a fiscal burden into creators of sustainable economic value for the region.

Referensi

Amdanata, D. D. (2022). Bagaimana Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK) Melakukan Audit terhadap Badan Usaha Milik Daerah (BUMD)? Hirarki : Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 3(3), 368–375. https://doi.org/10.30606/hirarki.v3i3.1384

Amdanata, D. D., & Mansor, N. (2016). Perbandingan Penerapan Good Corporate Governance pada BUMD Provinsi Riau dengan BUMD DKI Jakarta (Perbandingan dengan PT. Pembangunan Jaya Ancol). 1th Celscitech-UMRI 2016, 1, 1–5.

Arifudin, O., Juhadi, J., & Sofyan, Y. (2020). Pengaruh Sistem Pengendalian Internal dan Audit Internal terhadap Pelaksanaan Good Corporate Governance. Jemasi: Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 16(2), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.35449/jemasi.v16i2.138

Azre, I. A. (2019). Analisis Good Corporate Governance (GCG) pada Badan Usaha Milik Daerah (BUMD) Provinsi Sumatera Barat(Studi Kasus PT Grafika Jaya Sumbar). Jurnal Administrasi Dan Kebijakan Publik, 2(3), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.25077/jakp.2.3.187-203.2017

Diandra, N. I., Mabila, A., Alfitri, Y. Z., Sari, D. P., Khaerani, N. F., Maharani, S., Laura, N., Azizah, N., Ibnuwafi, Z., Kusuma, F. A., & Mentari, A. (2026). Peningkatan Sumber Pendapatan Daerah, Peningkatan Pendapatan Pajak& Retribusi Daerah. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 3(1), 57–68.

Febrianto, A., & Siroj, R. A. (2024). Studi literatur: Landasan dalam memilih metode penelitian yang tepat. Journal Educational Research and Development| E-ISSN: 3063-9158, 1(2), 259-263.

Hardani, R. (2025). Tata Kelola Badan Usaha Milik Daerah (BUMD). Regulasi, Proses Bisnis, Dan Manajemen Resiko. Deepublish.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

KNKG. (2006). Pedoman Umum Good Corporate Governance Indonesia. In KNKG. Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian.

Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Harvard University Press.

Mulyadi. (2016). Auditing (6th ed.). Salemba Empat.

Muryanto, Y. T. (2016). Tanggung Jawab Direksi dan Dewan Pengawas (Komisaris) dalam Pengelolaan Badan Usaha Milik Daerah untuk Mewujudkan Prinsip Tata Kelola Perusahaan yang Baik. Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Putri, R. K., & Muid, D. (2017). Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan. Dinonegoro Journal of Accounting, 6(3), 1–9.

Ramadhani, A. F., Suhendro, S., & Siddi, P. (2022). Pengaruh good corporate governance terhadap kinerja keuangan perusahaan badan usaha milik negara. FORUM EKONOMI, 24(1), 204–212. https://doi.org/10.30872/jfor.v24i1.10735

Tuanakotta, T. M. (2017). Akuntansi Forensik dan Audit Investigatif (Vol. 2). Salemba Empat.