Tinjauan Literatur Faktor Penentu Pengungkapan Corporate Social Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54957/jurnalku.v4i3.642Kata Kunci:
Corporate Social Performance, Corporate Social Responsibility, DisclosureAbstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengulas teori terkait dan faktor-faktor penentu Corporate Social Performance. Metode pada penelitian ini adalah literature review dengan pemilihan artikel yang terbit dalam kurun waktu 2018 hingga tahun 2022 dengan kata kunci pencarian “corporate social disclosure”. Penelitian ini hanya menggunakan artikel yang memiliki metode kuantitatif dalam menguji faktor yang mendorong pengungkapan tanggung jawab sosial atau Corporate Social Performance Disclosure (CSP-D). Berdasarkan hasil pencarian artikel yang sesuai kriteria, data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini berjumlah 11 artikel. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa pengungkapan corporate social performance dapat dijelaskan dalam teori pemengku kepentingan, teori keagenan, teori legitimasi, dan teori ketergantungan sumber daya di mana teori pemangku kepentingan merupakan teori dominan yang biasa digunakan dalam penerapan corporate social performance oleh perusahaan. Corporate social performance disclosure dipengaruhi oleh beberapa faktor diantaranya board size, size, profitability, CEO duality, board diversity, ownership concentration, managerial ownership, komite CSR, komite audit, komisaris independen, dan slack resources. Hasil penelitian juga menunjukan bahwa aspek tata kelola perusahaan menjadi faktor utama yang dapat mempengaruhi corporate social performance.
Referensi
Abu Qa’dan, M. B., & Suwaidan, M.S. (2019). Board composition, ownership structure and corporate social responsibility disclosure: the case of Jordan. Social Responsibility Journal, 15(1), 28-46. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-11-2017-0225
Adel, C., Hussain, M. M., Mohamed, E. K. A., & Basuony, M. A. K. (2019). Is corporate governance relevant to the quality of corporate social responsibility disclosure in large European companies? International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 27(2), 301-332. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-10-2017-0118
Ananzeh, H. (2022). Corporate governance and the quality of CSR disclosure: lessons from an emerging economy. Society and Business Review, 17(2), 280-306. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-09-2021-0153
Arvidsson, S. (2010). Communication of corporate social responsibility: A study of the views of management teams in large companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551‐ 010‐0469‐2
Barauskaite, G., & Streimikiene, D. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance of companies: The puzzle of concepts, definitions and assessment methods. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 278-287. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2048
Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Pavelin, S. (2007). Gender and ethnic diversity among UK corporate boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 393–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‐ 8683.2007.00569.
Branco, M.C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2008). Factors influencing social responsibility disclosure by Portuguese companies. Journal of Business Ethics. 83, 685–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9658-z
Carroll, A. B., & Brown, J. A. (2018). Corporate social responsibility: A review of current concepts, research, and issues. Corporate Social Responsibility, 2, 39-69. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2514-175920180000002002
Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117. https://doi.org/10.2307/258888
Coffie, W., Aboagye-Otchere, F., & Musah, A. (2018). Corporate social responsibility disclosures (CSRD), corporate governance and the degree of multinational activities: Evidence from a developing economy. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 8(1), 106-123. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-01-2017-0004
Fontaine, M. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability: The new bottom line? International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4 (4), 110–119. http://www.mktgsensei.com/AMAE/Vision%20and%20Mission/Corproate%20Social%20Responsibility%20Fontaine.pdf
Fiandrino, S., Devalle, A., & Cantino, V. (2019). Corporate governance and financial performance for engaging socially and environmentally responsible practices. Social Responsibility Journal, 15(2), 171-185. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-12-2017-0276
Garas, S., & Elmassah, S. (2018). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures: The case of GCC countries. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 14(1), 2-26. https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-10-2016-0042
Garcia, E. A. D. R., Carvalho, G. M. D., Boaventura, J. M. G., & Souza Filho, J. M. D. (2021). Determinants of corporate social performance disclosure: a literature review. Social Responsibility Journal, 17(4), 445-468. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-12-2016-0224
Hermawan, A., & Gunardi, A. (2019). Motivation for disclosure of corporate social responsibility: evidence from banking industry in Indonesia. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(3), 1297-1306. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.6.3(17)
Jizi, M. (2017). The influence of board composition on sustainable development disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26, 640–655. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1943
Kuo, L., Yeh, C.-C. and Yu, H.-C. (2012). Disclosure of corporate social responsibility and environmental management: evidence from China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19(5), 273-287. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.274
Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404-424. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.31193458 https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.31193458
Majidah, M., & Pangestu, F. I. G. (2022). Determinant factors of corporate social responsibility disclosure. The 5thEuropean International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 2868-2878. https://ieomsociety.org/proceedings/2022rome/560.pdf
Montiel, I., Husted, B. W., & Christmann, P. (2012). Using private management standard certification to reduce information asymmetries in corrupt environments. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 1103-1113. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1957
Orazalin, N. (2019). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in an emerging economy: evidence from commercial banks of Kazakhstan. Corporate Governance, 19(3), 490-507. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-09-2018-0290.
Pucheta-Martínez, M. C., & Gallego-Álvarez, I. (2019). An international approach of the relationship between board attributes and the disclosure of corporate social responsibility issues. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(3), 612-627. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1707
Rao, K., & Tilt, C. (2016). Board composition and corporate social responsibility: The role of diversity, gender, strategy and decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 138, 327–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10551‐015‐2613‐5
Salazar, J., Husted, B. W., & Biehl, M. (2012). Thoughts on the evaluation of corporate social performance through projects. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(2), 175-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0957-z
Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (Eds.). (2006). Managing the business case for sustainability. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf.
Ullah, M.S., Muttakin, M.B. and Khan, A. (2019). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures in insurance companies. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 27(2), 284-300. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-10-2017-0120
Wood, D. (2010). Measuring corporate social performance: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 50–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00274.x
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2024 Gusti Ardiarahman, Yuni Rahmawati, Amrie Firmansyah

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








